====== Why backend leaks compound silently ====== ===== The slow erosion problem ===== Backend leaks rarely explode overnight. They drip. A small refund increase. A slight drop in rebill survival. A minor rise in churn. Individually, they seem manageable. Over time, they compound. CBSplit was built to detect this silent erosion before it becomes structural damage. ===== Leaks begin as small percentages ===== Backend leaks often appear as: * 2–3% higher refund ratio * 5% lower first rebill survival * Slight increase in payment failures * Gradual rise in cancellations At low scale, these numbers look insignificant. At higher volume, they multiply into meaningful revenue loss. ===== Refund drift reduces net margin quietly ===== A small refund increase: * Reduces net revenue * Raises chargeback exposure * Weakens processor trust * Compresses margin Because revenue initially appears strong, the leak remains unnoticed. CBSplit recalculates performance after refund reconciliation. ===== Churn velocity compounds over billing cycles ===== In subscription funnels: * Small churn increases shorten LTV * Shorter LTV shifts breakeven thresholds * Lower retention weakens scaling capacity These effects compound across cohorts. Front-end dashboards do not capture this compounding decline. ===== Retry dependence masks instability ===== Payment retries can: * Temporarily recover failed transactions * Delay visible churn * Inflate apparent retention If revenue depends heavily on retries, stability is fragile. When retry performance changes, revenue drops quickly. CBSplit distinguishes durable rebills from recovery-driven revenue. ===== Scaling amplifies silent leaks ===== At low volume, backend leaks may appear harmless. When scaled: * Refund counts increase dramatically * Churn impact multiplies * Net revenue erodes faster * Risk thresholds approach Silent leaks become visible only after expansion. CBSplit identifies structural weakness before scaling magnifies it. ===== Aggregated reporting hides gradual decline ===== Blended dashboards average: * Strong cohorts * Weak cohorts * High-quality traffic * Fragile segments Gradual backend decline can hide inside stable averages. Segmentation is required to detect drift. ===== Compounding works in reverse ===== Compounding can grow profit. It can also amplify loss. Small backend weaknesses: * Reduce LTV * Increase acquisition pressure * Lower allowable CPA * Force campaign contraction The erosion is slow but persistent. CBSplit tracks lifecycle performance across time horizons.